|
Post by bobblehead on Apr 4, 2004 19:15:17 GMT -5
With Jim Niers' purchase of the track and the improvements that have been made to the facility. I feel it is once again the top dirt track in southern Ohio. From the mid 90's until around 2000 PRP was the place for racers and fans alike to come, but they seem to have declined slightly in areas. How do you guys feel?
|
|
|
Post by RJ7171C71R on Apr 4, 2004 21:46:04 GMT -5
I think it may be close to passing PRP,but PRP still has higher weekly car counts in my opinion!! These 2 tracks are my favorites but I still think Nier needs better weekly shows and I think PRP has the better Schedule also!! Thats just my opinion!! See ya around bobblehead!!
RJ7171C71R
P.S.The Conleys Rock and so does the DSP!!!
|
|
|
Post by QueenOfThePits on Apr 4, 2004 22:23:55 GMT -5
mmmmmm, I prefer KC to PRP, but PRP probably has a better car count still (based on last season), who knows what this season will bring. I know we can be home earlier from KC than we can PRP, it seems they run a timelier show at Alma.
|
|
|
Post by RJ7171C71R on Apr 4, 2004 23:32:05 GMT -5
Hey queen ,you may be right about running a timleier show,but they can do that beacuse of less cars LOL!! Plus Im not big sprint fan LOL!! So thats another point for PRP LOL!! See you around girl RJ7171C71R P.S.The Conleys rock and so does the DSP!!!
|
|
|
Post by Layne on Apr 5, 2004 7:51:12 GMT -5
PRP is great but I think that K-C is just a little bit better. I love the 410 Sprint Cars so that is why that K-C is my favorite track. To me, PRP is the better Late Model track.
|
|
|
Post by bobblehead on Apr 6, 2004 17:00:09 GMT -5
Did you guys read the Jim Nier interview in DIRT LATE MODEL Magazine? good article, interesting. It gave me the impression that he knows they have a few bugs in their program and that they are going to fix them. The really big advantage that Jim Nier has over PRP is that he is a racer, he knows what racers want and need. And if you take care of the racer, that will take care of the fan.
|
|